Susan foxely property santa monica4/3/2024 Santa Monica, Cal., Rent Control Law § 1803(q). What happens if a landlord fails to register their residential rental units with the city as required by the Rent Control Law?Īll properties that are covered under the rent ceiling provisions of the ordinance are required to be registered with the City. Santa Monica, Cal., Rent Control Law § 1807. Any provision in a lease or rental agreement (whether verbal or written) that waives a tenant’s rights under this ordinance is against public policy and therefore void and not enforceable by the landlord. Can a tenant waive their rights under the Santa Monica Rent Control Law? The Santa Monica Rent Control Law regulates how much a landlord can increase a tenant’s rent, and it prohibits eviction of tenants in rent-controlled units unless the landlord has a just-cause reason under the law. Because of the pandemic, landlords say they are still collecting far less in rent from tenants in downtown Santa Monica, some up to 25 percent less.Ī statement from the city said it has a “successful record adopting balanced housing policies that protect limited housing for long-term residents.” The recent law, the statement continued, is “legally valid,” but officials are “reviewing the challenges raised in the complaint that was recently filed.Santa Monica Rent Control Law What is the Santa Monica Rent Control Law? The measure also goes against the property rights of landlords, the lawsuit argues. Constitution’s equal protection clause because it disproportionately affects tenants hurt by Covid who may be looking for temporary residence near hospitals. The short-term rental law, according to the lawsuit, also violates the U.S. How does bowing to political pressure equate with an unlawful statute?įor one, it alleges Santa Monica is violating the California Coastal Act, which puts restrictions on city laws that govern land within 1,000 yards of the Pacific Ocean. The lawsuit says the city then “openly pushed an agenda that solely benefited the hospitality industry.” But the suit claims the city eventually “bowed to political pressure,” from UNITE HERE, the powerful union that represents hotel workers. Santa Monica officials initially decided against a mandatory long-term lease requirement, according to the lawsuit. The complaint details the two-year process by the city’s planning department to study a new rent-term measure, partly in response to concerns about the rise of Airbnb and other short-term rentals, many of them unregistered. Also, landlords cannot rent out furnished apartments.įiled on Monday in Los Angeles County Superior Court, the lawsuit paints a picture of once-powerful property owners who now feel blindsided by local government, and are trying different ways to fight back. Under the law, the seaside town of 91,000 people now requires that residential leases last a minimum of one year. Those firms include Scott Walter’s WS Communities - which is building 850 rental units in the city - and Neil Shekhter’s NMS Properties. The property owners behind 32 limited liability companies filed the lawsuit, which seeks to toss a measure the Santa Monica City Council passed in September. A slew of apartment landlords are suing the City of Santa Monica, claiming a law that bans short-term rentals is “arbitrary, capricious, and lacking in evidentiary support.”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |